Carlos Whitlock Porter – Germany v. Porter

Carlos Whitlock Porter

Germany v. Porter

Punishment first, trial afterwards

Buy the paper version of the book – AmazonThe Book Patch

Very little is published on the repression of dissenting historical research and political opinion in Europe. “Censorship” is something that happens only in Burma, China, Turkey, Egypt, and other far-away places. Censorship in Europe is simply a “matter of criminal law”!

The “law” is almost completely one-sided and the defendants are almost invariably so-called “right-wingers” and “nationalists”. In Germany, dissidents can be charged with 3 different offences: “popular incitement” (whatever that means), “incitement to racial hatred”, and “defaming the dead”. There is no objective definition of these offences and no way to distinguish between them (they are said to be “identical in law”); yet the first is punishable by 5 years imprisonment, while the second is punishable by 3 “only”. The statute of limitations is 10 years, as against 3 or 6 for most serious felonies. No transcripts are made of oral argument before the courts, and no substantive defense is possible: defendants are permitted to argue technicalities only. Lawyers “guilty” of defending their clients too vigorously are commonly imprisoned as well.

One case, however – the records of which are reproduced here – took an unexpected turn when the wild-card defendant refused to cooperate…

* * *

On April 25, 1995, a former member of the Wehrmacht (not the SS), Reinhold Elstner, burnt himself to death at the Feldherrnhalle in Munich to protest what he called the “Niagara of lies” engulfing Germany.

Astonishingly, the Munich police had the shamelessness to arrest people for placing wreaths on the spot, and to remove all the burn marks with a blow torch. In protest, I sent over 200 copies of Nicht schuldig in Nürnberg, a German translation of Not Guilty at Nuremberg, a brochure authored by myself, accompanied by a protest letter, one to every important newspaper, magazine and politician in the country, to Helmut Kohl, Richard von Weizsäcker and five others by registered mail, to make sure they got it.

The Mayor of Munich, a certain Christian Ude, got his knickers in a twist and the result was 17 months of so-called “legal proceedings” during which I told them more or less to bugger off. Of course, I was polite about it: I said, “I defy your authority and I refuse to comply with any order to do anything.”

For 17 months, the German courts ignored everything introduced by the Defendant, i.e., myself, in reply to the avalanche of subpoenas, summonses, certified letters, certified translations, demands for payment, etc. Jokes, insults, sarcasm, refusals to appear, demands for the production of evidence, irrefutable legal arguments, refusals to pay, etc. were all ignored – like a computer continually displaying the same error message.

Goaded beyond endurance, his back to the wall, the Defendant took drastic, perhaps unprecedented action…

Carlos W. Porter

Carlos Whitlock Porter – Germany v. Porter – PDF